<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qumana vs Ecto vs Performancing for Firefox Blog Posting Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools</link>
	<description>The Blogging &#38; WordPress Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: delonadenis</title>
		<link>http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools/comment-page-1#comment-27278</link>
		<dc:creator>delonadenis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools#comment-27278</guid>
		<description>I have been using Ecto for a while and have no complainants. I really enjoy being to resize photos right within the application. For me, Ecto is a winner.
--------------------
delonadenis
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ispire_itsolution.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Ecto for a while and have no complainants. I really enjoy being to resize photos right within the application. For me, Ecto is a winner.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
delonadenis<br />
<a href="http://www.ispire_itsolution.com" rel="nofollow">SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David - Los Angeles Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools/comment-page-1#comment-27017</link>
		<dc:creator>David - Los Angeles Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools#comment-27017</guid>
		<description>I tried scribefire, but I&#039;ve got so many plugins for wordpress that I can find links pictures and more from within the editor, I find the editor the fastest way to go, even though I have to copy and paste links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried scribefire, but I&#8217;ve got so many plugins for wordpress that I can find links pictures and more from within the editor, I find the editor the fastest way to go, even though I have to copy and paste links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools/comment-page-1#comment-20997</link>
		<dc:creator>botgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools#comment-20997</guid>
		<description>We are also impressed with Adobe Contribute as a great all-around editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are also impressed with Adobe Contribute as a great all-around editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorcycle Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools/comment-page-1#comment-3635</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorcycle Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 05:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools#comment-3635</guid>
		<description>Yeah I just started using Zoundry and it seems like quite a piece of software!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I just started using Zoundry and it seems like quite a piece of software!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk M</title>
		<link>http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentrobot.com/qumana-vs-ecto-vs-performancing-for-firefox-blog-posting-tools#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I also use Performancing for Firefox (PFF) and I couldn&#039;t be more pleased however, due to the shortcomings you listed I only use it as a &quot;pinch-hit&quot; editor. For my main editor I use Zoundry&#039;s BlogWriter and even though it&#039;s main purpose is for product reviewing, it makes an outstanding blog &quot;for the sake of blogging&quot; editor as well and there&#039;s no requirement to sign up for a Zoundry account plus it&#039;s free also. Real professional layout as well. Stable as a rock and no, I&#039;m not associated with Zoundry at all. I just know a good product when I see it. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also use Performancing for Firefox (PFF) and I couldn&#8217;t be more pleased however, due to the shortcomings you listed I only use it as a &#8220;pinch-hit&#8221; editor. For my main editor I use Zoundry&#8217;s BlogWriter and even though it&#8217;s main purpose is for product reviewing, it makes an outstanding blog &#8220;for the sake of blogging&#8221; editor as well and there&#8217;s no requirement to sign up for a Zoundry account plus it&#8217;s free also. Real professional layout as well. Stable as a rock and no, I&#8217;m not associated with Zoundry at all. I just know a good product when I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

